文章正文
The debate on “textbooks vs computers” has been going on for years. How much technology is in the
classroom? Should textbooks be placed by notebook computers?
The is no doubt that computers are powerful. Computer-based lesson plans are updated in real time.
New information can be added as soon as changes take place. Students can find the latest information for the
subjects they are studying.
With computers, students can learn how to use them for the rest of their lives. Today, computers are
used in almost all areas. Students can themselves better for the future if they have computers.
However, despite these advantages, I think textbooks must stay.
Textbooks are professionally edited, All the facts have been checked. They are put together in the best
way. Each chapter builds on what a student has previously learned. On the internet. however, not all the
information is true or organized.
With textbooks. it is easier for students to take notes. Scientists have found that taking notes by hand
helps students learn more.
Textbooks are also less expensive than computers. While most families can afford textbooks, not all of
them can afford a computer. Every student should be allowed to learn what lie needs to learn. It’s wrong to
rob a student of his right to learn just because he can’t afford the material.
Computers are playing an important role in education. They allow students to team more. However, I
don’t think they can replace textbooks. If students want to learn well, they must use textbooks. Do you agree
with me?
文章问题
78 What is the main idea of the second paragraph?
79 Does the third paragraph suggest that computers are useful to students?
80 How ninny advantages do textbooks have according to the passage?
81 What advantage do textbooks have over computers according to paragraph 7?
82 What’s the writer’s point of view in the last paragraph?
83 Do you think computers should replace textbooks? Why or Why not?
文章大意
给文章一个有趣的英文命名，并给出翻译 命名："Tech Titans vs. Timeless Texts: The Classroom Showdown" 翻译：科技巨头对决永恒文本：课堂对决
文章大意 文章讨论了在教育领域中教科书与电脑的长期辩论，比较了电脑的实时更新和信息获取能力，同时也强调了教科书在准确性、笔记便利性和经济性方面的优势，并最终得出结论，电脑不能取代教科书。
每段中心思想
第一段：介绍了教科书与电脑在教育中的辩论。
第二段：强调了电脑在教育中的强大功能和实时更新的优势。
第三段：讨论了电脑对学生未来技能的重要性。
第四段：转折，提出尽管电脑有优势，但教科书必须保留。
第五段：讨论了教科书的专业编辑和知识准确性。
第六段：提到了教科书便于学生记笔记的优势。
第七段：强调教科书的经济性，确保所有学生都能负担得起。
第八段：总结，认为电脑不能取代教科书，学生需要使用教科书来学习。
每段之间的逻辑关系
第一段设定了辩论的背景。
第二段和第三段阐述了电脑的优势。
第四段转折，引出教科书的重要性。
第五段、第六段和第七段分别从不同角度支持第四段的观点，强调教科书的优势。
第八段总结全文，重申作者的观点，并提出问题，邀请读者思考。
逐一回答问题
78 What is the main idea of the second paragraph?
问题翻译：第二段的主要观点是什么？
回答：The main idea is that computers offer significant advantages in education by providing up-to-date and real-time updated lesson plans.
回答翻译：主要观点是电脑在教育中提供了显著的优势，包括提供最新的和实时更新的课程计划。
依据："The is no doubt that computers are powerful. Computer-based lesson plans are updated in real time. New information can be added as soon as changes take place. Students can find the latest information for the subjects they are studying."
依据翻译："毫无疑问，电脑是强大的。基于电脑的课程计划可以实时更新。新信息可以立即添加，一旦发生变化。学生可以找到他们正在学习的科目的最新信息。"
79 Does the third paragraph suggest that computers are useful to students?
问题翻译：第三段是否表明电脑对学生有用？
回答：Yes, the paragraph suggests that computers are useful to students as they can prepare them for future use in various areas of life.
回答翻译：是的，这段话表明电脑对学生有用，因为它们可以为学生准备未来在各种生活领域的使用。
依据："With computers, students can learn how to use them for the rest of their lives. Today, computers are used in almost all areas. Students can themselves better for the future if they have computers."
依据翻译："有了电脑，学生可以学会如何在未来使用它们。今天，电脑几乎在所有领域都被使用。如果学生拥有电脑，他们可以为自己更好地准备未来。"
80 How ninny advantages do textbooks have according to the passage?
问题翻译：根据文章，教科书有多少优势？
回答：Textbooks have three advantages mentioned in the passage: they are professionally edited, they facilitate note-taking, and they are more affordable.
回答翻译：文章中提到教科书有三个优势：它们是专业编辑的，它们便于记笔记，它们更便宜。
依据："Textbooks are professionally edited, All the facts have been checked. They are put together in the best way. Each chapter builds on what a student has previously learned." "With textbooks. it is easier for students to take notes." "Textbooks are also less expensive than computers."
依据翻译："教科书是专业编辑的，所有事实都经过了检查。它们以最好的方式组合在一起。每一章都建立在学生之前学到的内容上。" "有了教科书，学生记笔记更容易。" "教科书也比电脑便宜。"
81 What advantage do textbooks have over computers according to paragraph 7?
问题翻译：根据第七段，教科书比电脑有什么优势？
回答：Textbooks are more affordable than computers.
回答翻译：教科书比电脑更便宜。
依据："Textbooks are also less expensive than computers."
依据翻译："教科书也比电脑便宜。"
82 What’s the writer’s point of view in the last paragraph?
问题翻译：作者在最后一段的观点是什么？
回答：The writer believes that while computers are important in education, they cannot replace textbooks, and students must use textbooks to learn effectively.
回答翻译：作者认为，尽管电脑在教育中很重要，但它们不能取代教科书，学生必须使用教科书来有效学习。
依据："However, I don’t think they can replace textbooks. If students want to learn well, they must use textbooks."
依据翻译："然而，我不认为它们能取代教科书。如果学生想要学好，他们必须使用教科书。"
83 Do you think computers should replace textbooks? Why or Why not?
问题翻译：你认为电脑应该取代教科书吗？为什么？
回答：No, I don't think computers should replace textbooks because textbooks offer professionally edited content, support better note-taking, and are more affordable, ensuring equal access to education.
回答翻译：不，我认为电脑不应该取代教科书，因为教科书提供专业编辑的内容，支持更好的记笔记，并且更便宜，确保了教育的平等获取。
依据："Textbooks are professionally edited," "With textbooks. it is easier for students to take notes," "Textbooks are also less expensive than computers." 依据翻译："教科书是专业编辑的，" "有了教科书，学生记笔记更容易，" "教科书也比电脑便宜。"
